Regular Call for Semester 17B
|Semester start of observing||2017-08-02 00:00 UT|
|Semester end of observing||2018-02-02 00:00 UT|
The East Asian Observatory invites observing proposals of two types at this time:
1. 17B PI Proposals
Proposals with Principal Investigators (PIs) from its partner regions (China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan) or from eligible PIs in the UK and Canada. Please check the eligibility requirements to see if you are eligible to submit as PI.
PI requests are limited to a maximum of 200 hours; each PI proposal should aim to be completed during the semester.
- The Time Allocation Committee (TAC) for JCMT will assess each PI proposal for scientific merit and will rank and approve observing time accordingly.
- We encourage multi-national collaboration — time will be distributed following the rules for collaborative projects.
- We also encourage projects which request the heterodyne instruments and/or weather bands 4 and 5.
- Anyone who submits a proposal to the JCMT should expect to be called upon to review one or two of the other proposals received in the same round. Your co-operation in the review process is appreciated.
2. JCMT Large Programs II (to encompass all semesters from 17B up to and including 19B)
Applications for the second JCMT Large Program Call for the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. Large Programs are defined by the observatory as projects which require significant amounts (> 200 hours) of observing time, require more than a single semester to complete and that take full advantage of the JCMT instrumentational capabilities to address multiple important scientific questions. This call is aimed at continuing and growing the impact of the first generation of JCMT Large Programs undertaken as EAO/JCMT and the JCMT Legacy Surveys.
Submissions will be accepted from scientists in any of the East Asian Observatory regions (Japan, China, Taiwan and South Korea) and participating JCMT regions (UK and Canada). For more information please read the EAO eligibility pages. Any scientist from these regions is eligible to participate at any level (PI or co-I) in a survey proposal. Collaborations are strongly encouraged and subject to the requirements detailed below (see Large Program Definitions and Requirements). Multiple regional coordinators (one per region) should be identified in the text of Large Program proposals. One of these should be designated as PI for the purposes of the proposal submission system.
Full details of this second Large Programs Call are available here:
The length limits for all Large Program Science and Technical Justifications are 8 and 5 pages respectively. These must both be uploaded as PDF files.
Please note the Large Programs II Call extends beyond the date range listed in Hedwig.
Please note that maximum permitted size for PDF file uploads (scientific justification and technical justification) for all proposal types is 10 MB.
- RxW and FTS-2 are not being offered in this call.
- There are two submission queues for this semester, labeled “PI Science” and “Large Programs”.
- Applicants from the University of Hawaii have a separate application process and may have a different deadline.
Content of Proposal
Proposal authors are expected to provide separately both a Scientific and a Technical Justification for their proposed observations. These justifications should be substantiated with results from our integration time calculators to show that the proposed observations will reach the necessary noise limits for your science goals. The calculators are integrated into our proposal submission system, and you should use them to save your calculation(s) to your proposal.
Overheads for pointing, focusing, and calibrations should not be added to the time request. These activities will be accounted for separately. Calibration observations (e.g. focus, pointing, flux calibrators) and other unavoidable overheads (e.g. receiver tuning) are not charged to science projects and instead are charged to an observatory accounting code. There is therefore no need for applicants to provide calibration overhead estimates in their proposals. The observatory will perform regular and appropriate calibration observations to ensure that all science data obtained are sensibly calibrated.
- Spectroscopically, this involves observations of one of our spectral line standards at one of about ten different line frequencies. If your observing frequency is one of these, then you’re decidedly in luck. In any case, the calibration allows you to assess the performance of the instrument. We will perform such an observation at least once per program unless a previous calibration is still appropriate, and more often if circumstances change or if more than a couple of hours pass.
- For continuum work, calibrators will be observed at both operational wavelengths of SCUBA-2 (450µm, 850µm) at appropriate times and airmass to meet the general needs of the science program.
If a proposal demands more unusual or more frequent calibrations then this needs to be clearly stated in the proposal and the time for these calibrations requested explicitly. If you have queries about what our default calibrations might be or what extra overheads are generated by your calibration requirements please get in touch with us.
The proposers should provide information on any previous, successful JCMT allocations, including any papers published as a result or the status of the project. The success of previous projects can be taken into account when awarding time, so it is in your interests to provide full information on this. A section is included within the proposal submission system for this information.
Data Available from the Archive and Large Programs
We expect all proposers to check that there are not already existing public data that meet your science needs, or conflicting large programs, before you submit your proposal. To help you with this, we have built in a clash tool which you can use to search for potential “clashes” between your proposed objects and available data sets. It also provides a link to an archive search for each target position. It is your responsibility to ensure you comment sufficiently on why any matching data does not meet your needs — e.g. because it does not reach sufficient depth, or because is not at the right frequency, or because the observations were not of sufficient quality.
The ‘Outreach’ version of your science
This semester we are continuing with a scheme to make JCMT science understandable to a more lay audience. Please provide a paragraph describing the goals of your proposal in the “Public Summary” section — a translation of your abstract might be a good starting point. We will use this in JCMT outreach efforts.
The overall philosophy of observing at JCMT is to match observing programs to the weather — see the Flexible Observing Guidelines for more information — so data can be acquired for a project at any time, even without the applicants being in attendance at the telescope. A summary was also given at the January 2015 Workshops.
Please use the “Members” section of the proposal form to express your willingness and ability to travel and observe. Observers are invited on the basis of their project demands and TAC ranking, and will receive additional priority when in attendance. Observers are needed to staff the observatory each night that a TSS is present at the telescope, although we now also operate JCMT remotely on some nights; affected observers should still attend in order to retain their enhanced priority.
- If you have read all of the above and still have questions, please use the “Contact us” link at the bottom of any page in the proposal submission system.