Regular Call for Semester 22A

Semester Information

Semester start of observing 2022-02-02 00:00 UT
Semester end of observing 2022-08-02 00:00 UT

The East Asian Observatory invites observing proposals of two types at this time:

1. 22A PI Proposals

The East Asian Observatory invites observing proposals with Principal Investigators (PIs) from its partner regions (China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan), from Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand or Vietnam, or from eligible PIs in the UK. All prospective PIs should review the JCMT eligibility requirements page prior to the preparation and submission of a proposal.

PI requests are limited to a maximum of 200 hours; each PI proposal should aim to be completed during the semester.

Important Notes

2. JCMT Large Programs IV (to encompass all semesters from 22A up to and including 24B)

Applications are invited for the fourth Large Programs Call for the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. Large Programs are defined by the Observatory as projects which require significant amounts (> 200 hours) of observing time, require more than a single semester to complete and that take full advantage of the capabilities of the JCMT’s instrumentation to address multiple important scientific questions. This Call, for weather bands 4 and/or 5 only, is aimed at continuing and growing the impact of the previous generations of JCMT Large Programs and Legacy Surveys.

Submissions will be accepted from scientists in any of the East Asian Observatory regions (China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan), from Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia or Thailand, or from eligible PIs in the UK/Ireland or Canada. Please see the JCMT eligibility requirements page for more information. Any scientist from these regions is eligible to participate at any level (PI or co-I) in a survey proposal. Collaborations are strongly encouraged and subject to the requirements detailed below (see the “Large Program Definitions and Requirements” section of this page). Multiple regional coordinators (one per region) should be identified in the text of Large Program proposals. One of these should be designated as PI for the purposes of the proposal submission system.

Full details of this fourth Large Programs Call are available here:

https://www.eaobservatory.org/jcmt/proposals/large-programs-iv/

The length limits for all Large Program Science and Technical Justifications are 8 and 5 pages respectively. These must both be uploaded as PDF files.

Please note that maximum permitted size for PDF file uploads (scientific justification and technical justification) for all proposal types is 10 MB.

Available Instruments

Content of Proposal

Proposal authors are expected to provide separately both a Scientific and a Technical Justification for their proposed observations. These justifications should be substantiated by results from the JCMT integration time calculators to show that the proposed observations will reach the necessary noise limits for the proposed science goals. The calculators are integrated into the proposal submission system, and should be used to save the calculation(s) for their inclusion in the proposal.

Calibrations

Overheads for pointing, focusing, and calibrations should not be added to the time request. These activities will be accounted for separately. Calibration observations (e.g. focus, pointing, flux calibrators) and other unavoidable overheads (e.g. receiver tuning) are not charged to science projects and instead are charged to an Observatory accounting code. There is therefore no need for applicants to provide calibration overhead estimates in their proposals. The Observatory will perform regular and appropriate calibration observations to ensure that all science data obtained are sensibly calibrated.

If a proposal demands more unusual or more frequent calibrations then this needs to be clearly stated in the proposal and the time for these calibrations requested explicitly. For queries about what the default calibrations might be, or what extra overheads are generated by a project’s calibration requirements, please consult JCMT staff.

Previous Proposals

The proposers should provide information on any previous successful (or otherwise) JCMT proposals, including any papers published as a result or the status of the project. The success of previous projects can be taken into account when awarding time, so it is in the proposers’ interests to provide full information on this. A section is included within the proposal submission system for this information.

Data Available from the Archive and Large Programs

All proposers are expected to check that there are no preexisting public data that meet the proposal’s science needs, or conflicting large programs, before submitting a proposal. A clash tool is available to aid in this, which can be used to search for potential “clashes” between the proposed objects and available data sets. It also provides a link to an archive search for each target position.

It is the proposers’ responsibility to ensure that sufficient explanation is included as to why any matching data does not meet the project’s needs — e.g. because it does not reach sufficient depth, or because is not at the right frequency, or because the observations were not of sufficient quality.

The ‘Outreach’ version of the proposed science

In the ‘Public Summary’ section, proposers should provide a paragraph describing the goals of the proposal in a way that is understandable to a general (non-scientific) audience. This may be used in JCMT outreach efforts.

Flexible Scheduling

The overall philosophy of observing at JCMT is to match observing programs to the weather — see the Flexible Observing Guidelines page for more information. JCMT observations are conducted remotely on behalf of the proposers, in accordance with EAO flexible observing guidelines.

Shared Risk Observing (ʻĀweoweo)

The Observatory offers this opportunity with the strong caveat that this observing mode is still under development and/or commissioning. Scientific results cannot be guaranteed for sensitivity, calibration and/or reliability without further work between the project observers and Observatory staff. The Observatory will make best efforts to assist scientists with the observing request, data acquisition and reduction, and result analysis. Time will not be returned to the project should the needed sensitivity or other parameters not be met.

Further Questions

For any remaining further questions, please use the “Contact us” link at the bottom of any page of the proposal submission system.